<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott's Blog &#187; John McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottforbes.net/tag/john-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottforbes.net</link>
	<description>All the clever blog names were taken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:04:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Being John McCain</title>
		<link>http://scottforbes.net/2009/07/10/being-john-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://scottforbes.net/2009/07/10/being-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Forbes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottforbes.net/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Steinglass: Sullivan writes “McCain knew full well that Palin was unqualified to be commander-in-chief.” But here’s the thing: John McCain is unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief. Back in January 2008 I attended a &#8220;practice caucus,&#8221; hosted for fun by the fine folks at Drinking Liberally. It was held a few days after Obama won in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mattsteinglass.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/why-mccain-matters/">Matt Steinglass</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Sullivan writes “McCain knew full well that Palin was unqualified to be commander-in-chief.” But here’s the thing: <em>John McCain</em> is unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Back in January 2008 I attended a &#8220;practice caucus,&#8221; hosted for fun by the fine folks at <a href="http://drinkingliberally.org">Drinking Liberally</a>.  It was held a few days after Obama won in Iowa, and a few days before Hillary won in New Hampshire, so all the Democratic candidates were still in the running — and, unlike the real caucuses later that year, the atmosphere was cozy enough that the thirty or forty attendees could genuinely talk to each other about the merits of each candidate.</p>
<p>So we all pretended to caucus, declared for our candidates, and then made the rounds from one group to the next, trying to peel off an Edwards supporter here, or a Kucinich fan there, so that the numbers rounded up to give Obama one more delegate.  I remember making the pitch for Obama and arguing that <em>any</em> of the Democratic Party&#8217;s top candidates would go on to win the 2008 election:  Hillary could beat Guiliani, Dodd could beat Thompson, and so on for every combination on the list.<a href="http://scottforbes.net/2009/07/10/being-john-mccain/#footnote_0_85" id="identifier_0_85" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="In hindsight, John Edwards was the one Democratic candidate who could have blown the 2008 election and handed the White House to John McCain&amp;#8230; which, among other reasons, is why Edwards will never, ever be forgiven or rehabilitated.">1</a></p>
<p>But one of my arguments for Barack Obama was that he would most likely draw John McCain as his opponent — and that Obama was <em>especially</em> well positioned to bring out John McCain&#8217;s worst qualities. <a href="http://scottforbes.net/2009/07/10/being-john-mccain/#footnote_1_85" id="identifier_1_85" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="In fact I argued the GOP&amp;#8217;s entire playbook would fail against Obama:  Since 1988 the GOP has relied on what Josh Marshall calls the bitch-slap theory of electoral politics to belittle and marginalize their opponents &acirc; and Obama had repeatedly demonstrated that he could turn such attacks against the attackers, by either appealing to the public&amp;#8217;s desire to change the tone of our politics, or by calling out the opponent and deftly mocking them.">2</a>  And he did:  McCain&#8217;s legendary temper, his age, his erratic and impulsive decisions, and his visceral, personal hatred of Obama were all on display throughout the 2008 campaign.</p>
<p>Admittedly McCain might have self-destructed no matter who he was running against, and his choice of Sarah Palin was only one of several Hail-Mary efforts to shake up a race he was clearly losing — but it was Palin who clearly revealed how reckless and unprepared John McCain really was.  As disastrous as George W. Bush was for America, McCain would have been far worse:  By now we&#8217;d be in a second Great Depression <em>and</em> a shooting war with Iran, just for starters.</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_85" class="footnote">In hindsight, John Edwards was the one Democratic candidate who could have blown the 2008 election and handed the White House to John McCain&#8230; which, among other reasons, is why Edwards will never, ever be forgiven or rehabilitated.</li><li id="footnote_1_85" class="footnote">In fact I argued the GOP&#8217;s entire <em>playbook</em> would fail against Obama:  Since 1988 the GOP has relied on what Josh Marshall calls <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003295.php">the bitch-slap theory of electoral politics</a> to belittle and marginalize their opponents — and Obama had repeatedly demonstrated that he could turn such attacks against the attackers, by either appealing to the public&#8217;s desire to change the tone of our politics, or by calling out the opponent and deftly mocking them.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottforbes.net/2009/07/10/being-john-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheney endorses McCain</title>
		<link>http://scottforbes.net/2008/11/02/cheney-endorses-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://scottforbes.net/2008/11/02/cheney-endorses-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Forbes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottforbes.net/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder what would have happened if Luke had said yes when Vader offered to make him co-Emperor? I think John McCain is finding out this week. I&#8217;m not sure where Obama fits into this analogy (though I suspect Obama&#8217;s Star Wars name actually is &#8220;Barack Obama&#8221;), but my impression of McCain has gone this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://scottforbes.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/175px-vaderfather.jpg" alt="175px-VaderFather.jpg" width="175" height="131" align="left" /> Ever wonder what would have happened if Luke had said <em>yes</em> when Vader offered to make him co-Emperor?</p>
<p>I think John McCain is finding out this week.  I&#8217;m not sure where Obama fits into this analogy (though I suspect Obama&#8217;s <a href="http://www.blueharvest.net/games/name/">Star Wars name</a> actually <em>is</em> &#8220;Barack Obama&#8221;), but my impression of McCain has gone this route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottforbes.net/2008/11/02/cheney-endorses-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
